ISSN 03 02 4660         AN OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE PAEDIATRIC ASSOCIATION OF NIGERIA


Nigerian J Paediatrics 2017 vol 44 issue 1

Nigerian J Paediatrics 2017 vol 44 issue 1

Issue
Archives
Instructions
Submit Article
Search
Contact Us
 
 
Home
Issue
Archives
Instructions
Submit Article
Search
Contact Us
Home
Quick Navigation
Congenital anomalies Prospective study of pattern and associated risk factors in infants presenting to a tertiary hospital in Anambra State South east Nigeria
Niger J Paediatr 2017; 44 (2):76 – 80
ORIGINAL
Ekwunife OH
Congenital anomalies: Prospective
Okoli CC
Ugwu JO
study of pattern and associated
Modekwe VI
risk factors in infants presenting to
Ekwesianya AC
a tertiary hospital in Anambra
State, South-east Nigeria
DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/njp.v44i2.6
Accepted: 2nd April 2017
Abstract : Background: Contem-
mothers took herbal prescriptions
porary understanding of the pat-
in the first trimester of pregnancy.
Ekwunife OH (
)
tern of congenital anomalies is
Risk of anomaly progressively
Okoli CC, Ugwu JO, Modekwe VI
both important in its clinical man-
rises, reaching a peak of 48% in
Ekwesianya AC
agement as well as in improving
the maternal age group of 26-30
Department of Surgery
the overall health of the commu-
years and drops steadily after. Gas-
Nnamdi Azikiwe University
nity.
trointestinal tract anomalies were
Teaching Hospital Nnewi
Methodology: All infants present-
most common (no. =28, 25.9%).
Anambra State Nigeria
ing from January to December
Residences close to dump sites,
Email:
2102 at the centre were prospec-
telecom masts/base stations, elec-
hyginusekwunife@yahoo.com
tively studied.
tricity cables, industries and heavy
Results: A total of 5010 infants
motorised highways contributed to
were screened, of which 108 have
risk factors in 9-12 % of cases.
congenital anomalies giving a
Conclusion: More of younger
prevalence
of
2.2%.
Major
mothers were affected with gastro
anomalies were noted in 101
intestinal malformations predomi-
(93.5%) infants. Only two (1.9%)
nating. The location of home envi-
were preterm. Consanguineous
ronment is a potential risk factor
relationship was observed in 2
that will require further characteri-
(1.9%) cases. Pre natal Ultrasound
sation.
scan was done in 33(30.8%), but
in only 7 (6.5%) was any anomaly
Key words: Congenital disorder,
detected
Malformations, Birth defects, Risk
Onitsha, a densely populated ur-
factors, Epidemiology, Nigeria,
ban area contributed 45(42%) of
Anambra
the cases. Only 7(6.5%) of the
Introduction
The aetiology of congenital anomalies is unknown in
about 50% cases. Identifiable causes include single
Congenital anomalies also known as birth defects, con-
gene defects(6-7%), chromosomal abnormalities(6-7%),
genital malformations or congenital disorders are struc-
multi-factorial disorders which are the result of interac-
tural or functional anomalies that occur during intrauter-
tion between genetic predisposition and presumed envi-
ine life and can be identified prenatally, at birth or later
ronmental factors(20-25%), and teratogenic factors (6-
7%).
11
in life. Understanding of the pattern of congenital
1
Responsible for the high rate of anomalies in
anomalies is both important in the clinical management
low and medium income countries( LMIC’s) is a combi-
of the condition as well as in improving the overall
nation of factors including adverse environmental attrib-
health of the community.
utes like high infective diseases, urbanization with atten-
dant slums, pollution, industrial wastes , living close to
dump sites , and poor nutrition.
1
The epidemiology of congenital anomalies varies from
period to period and from region to region. In devel-
oped economies, the prevalence varies from 1.07% to
The LMIC’s also bear the greater burden of increasing
4.4%.
2,3
Establishment of congenital anomaly registry
perinatal deaths from congenital anomalies estimated at
or surveillance has enabled better monitoring of epide-
12.7%.
12
Survivors many times may have livelong dis-
miological trends and institution of preventive mecha-
abilities with impairment of quality of life.
nisms in some of these nations. In Nigeria, available
4,5
reports have prevalence rates ranging from 0.75%-
This article aims to study the contemporary epidemiol-
13.9%.
6-10
ogy and risk factors associated with congenital anoma-
77
lies in our region, Anambra state, south east Nigeria,
Results
thus enabling data for establishment of better control
measures .
Of the total of 5010 infants screened, 108 have congeni-
tal anomalies giving a prevalence of 2.2%. More males
were affected, 71 (65.7%) than females, 34(31.6%) with
an M: F ratio of 2:1. Three (2.8%) neonates have Disor-
Methodology
ders of Sex Differentiation (DSD). Major anomalies
were noted in 101(93.5%) infants while the rest 7(6.5%)
Every infant that presented for treatment at the outpa-
were minor. Fourteen (13.0%) had multiple anomalies.
tient, inpatient, special baby care and the children emer-
Only two (1.9%) were preterm. Consanguineous rela-
gency departments of the hospital within the study pe-
tionship was observed in another 2(1.9%) cases.
riod was screened for the presence of any structural con-
Prenatal Ultrasound was done in 33(30.8%), but in only
genital anomaly.
7 (6.5%) was any anomaly detected
Once a case was identified, a trained investigator further
Risk of anomaly progressively rises, reaching a peak of
interviewed the parents and examined the infant, obtain-
48% in the maternal age group of 26-30 years and drops
ing required data using a structured close ended inter-
thereafter. Mean peak maternal age was 8.5years (SD
viewer administered questionnaire. Data was collected
=6.05).
Figure 1 shows the trend and compares be-
for one year (January to December, 2012) and covers
tween maternal and paternal age group occurrences.
bio-data, malformation characteristics, parental attrib-
Table 1 shows a summary of identifiable environmental
utes, and environmental conditions at the place of habi-
risk factors. Twelve infants (11.1%) have associated
tation.
identifiable multiple risk factors. Only six(5.6%)mothers
Ethical approval was obtained from the institutions Ethi-
had any form of chronic illness while 23(24.1%) re-
cal Committee. Consent from the child’s parent or
ported abuse of drugs as shown in tables 2 and 3 respec-
guardian was also obtained.
tively.
Congenital cardiac anomalies were excluded from the
study due to unavailability of diagnostic tools.
Table 1: Frequency of identified risk factors
No. of risk factors
frequency
%
Study place
None
65
60.2
One risk factor
31
28.7
Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital is a terti-
Two risk factors
7
6.5
ary hospital in Anambra State, South East Nigeria. Be-
Three risk factors
4
9
ing the only institution in the state with neonatal, paedi-
> 3 risk factors
1
0.9
atric and paediatric surgical services, it receives such
Total
108
100.0
patients from all parts of the state and some neighbour-
ing states. It thus serves a population of over five mil-
Fig 1: Trend and comparison between maternal and paternal
lion people.
13
Anambra is one of the most urbanized
age groups, with frequencies
states in Nigeria; over 60% of its population live in ur-
60
ban areas with most engaging in commercial activities
as occupation.
14
50
Distances
40
For the purposes of the study, living within the under
30
Maternal age group
mentioned distances is described as living close to the
Paternal age group
site: 100metres circumference from a refuse dump site,
20
300metres circumference of a telecommunication mast/
10
base station or a heavily motorised highway and 50me-
tre from high voltage electricity transmission cables.
0
Distances were estimates obtained by respondents
15-20
21-25
26-30
31-35
36-40
41-45
46-50
>50
guided by trained interviewer.
Data analysis
Table 2: Maternal chronic illness during pregnancy
Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social
Illness
frequency
%
Sciences (IBM SPSS statistics for Windows version
Diabetes Mellitus
1
0.9
21.0 Armonk, NY: IBM Corp). Results for categorical
Human Immune deficiency virus
1
0.9
variables were expressed using tables and charts while
Multinodular goitre
1
0.9
continuous data were expressed using mean and stan-
High Blood Pressure
3
2.8
dard deviations where appropriate. Associations be-
Total
6
5.6
tween categorical data were determined using Pearson
Chi square test. Statistical significance was inferred at
p- value of < 0.05.
78
Fig 2: Number of occurrences according to residence
Fig 3: Potential risk factors at the place of residence
Frequencies of place of residence
Others, 28, 26%
Onitsha, 45, 42%
Onitsha
Nnewi
Awka
Aguata
Nnewi, 23, 21%
Aguata, 6, 6%
Others
Awka, 6, 5%
Table 3: Frequencies of drug abuse
Drug ingestion at 1st Trimester
No (%)
Self medication with orthodox drugs
13 (12.1)
Took herbal preparations
7 (6.5)
Alcohol ingestion
6 (5.6)
Cigarette/marijuana smoking
0 (0)
Discussion
Table 4: Distribution of the anomalies
The prevalence of 2.2% from this study closely resem-
bles rates from other reports from the South Eastern
Type of anomaly
Frequency
%
region of the country.
15
It is however lower than rates
Central Nervous System
Spina bifida
8
7.4
from the northern part of the country (13.9%) where
adequate antenatal care utilization is reportedly low.
10
Hydrocephalous
6
5.5
Encephalocoele
2
1.9
About 90% of the mothers in our study received antena-
Scalp dermoid
1
0.9
tal care from the second trimester. It may be adduced
Microcephalous
1
0.9
that an improved education, improved socioeconomic
Total
(18)
(16.7)
state and an increased awareness may have influenced
Gastrointestinal tract
this higher health seeking behaviour and hence a lower
Intestinal atresias
8
7.4
prevalence.
Omphalocoele
6
5.5
However, despite this high antenatal care rate, our study
Anorectal malformation
6
5.5
Hirschsprung’s disease
3
2.8
showed both low level utilization of prenatal diagnosis
Gastroschisis
2
1.9
and low capacity of identifying positive cases. Only
Malrotation
2
1.9
about a third (33%)of the study population with con-
Oesophageal atresia
1
0.9
genital malformation had prenatal ultrasound. Abnor-
Total
(28)
(25.9)
mality was only detected in 6% of these. Prenatal ultra
Urogenital System
sound has an overall anomaly detection rate of 35%.
16
Hypospadias
10
9.3
The low sensitivity may be attributed to the fact that
Posterior Urethral Valve
7
6.5
more than 90% of these screening were not done in a
Disorders of sex development 3
2.8
tertiary centre. Sensitivity, specificity and positive pre-
Prune belly syndrome
2
1.9
Bladder extrophy
1
0.9
dictive value are better when high risk pregnancies are
screened in a tertiary hospital.
16
Epispadias
1
0.9
Total
(25)
(23.1)
Musculoskeletal
The pattern of anomalies varies from period to period
Polydactyly
5
4.6
and from region to region. In our study, anomalies of the
Congenital Talipes EquinoVarus 5
4-6
gastrointestinal tract had the highest occurrence of 28
Syndactyly
2
1.9
(25.9%), followed in order by the urogenital tract
Aplasia cutis congenita
1
0.9
(23.1%) and the central nervous system (16.7%) (Table
Total
(13)
(12.0)
4). The predominance of gastrointestinal anomalies was
Face
also documented by several other Nigerian reports.
10, 17
Cleft lip/palate
15
13.9
Microtia
1
0.9
However few other centres have central nervous system
Haemangioma
3
2.8
or musculoskeletal system as the most common affected
Total
(19)
(17.6)
system. Of the individual anomalies; cleft lip/palate
Tumours
(13.9%), hypospadias (9.3%), atresias (7.4%) and Spina
Cervical teratoma
2
1.9
bifida (7.4%) were the leading anomalies. The high rate
Sacrococcygeal teratoma
1
0.9
of cleft lip/palate anomalies may be attributed to the
Total
(3)
(2.8)
hospital being recently adopted as a partner for the Smile
Chromosomal
Train (a United State based international children’s
Down’s syndrome
3
2.8
Total
(3)
(2.8)
charity) free corrective repairs programme and thus was
Grand total
108
100/
receiving referrals from many other regions.
79
While the maternal age group with the highest number
40% of the aetiology. In our study about 9-14 % of the
of occurrence was 26-30 years, 75% of the mothers were
mothers while pregnant were found to have been ex-
aged 30 years and below (Figure 1). Prevalence was
posed to either one or a combination of pollution from
higher in young mothers and progressively rises, peak-
heavy vehicular traffic, industries, or living near a refuse
ing at 30years and then declines steadily. Twenty eight
dump, high tension electricity transmission cable or tele-
percent of the mothers were primipara. However there
communication mast / base stations (Figure 3). Concerns
was no significant relationship between age of primip
have grown on the effect of these modern conveniences
with the type of the anomaly ( p =0.633 ). The high num-
on the reproductive health. Studies are quite scanty in
ber of young mothers with congenital anomalies can be
this area. Living near telecommunication base stations
explained from the high number of structural, non chro-
or masts, which can transmit 1900-2200MHZ frequency
mosomal anomalies in our study in contrast to chromo-
range, can expose one to high levels of radiofrequency
waves which can affect developing foetus.
19
somal anomalies which increases with increasing mater-
Living
nal age.
18
close to a highway predisposes one to pollutants like
carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons and particulate matter
We recorded only 1.9% preterms. This low level may
all of which have adverse reproductive outcomes.
20
be alluded to the fact that majority of the babies were
High electromagnetic fields from power lines, pollutants
delivered outside the tertiary centre. It may be possible
from industries and emissions from dump sites all have
that some affected neonates may have not survived to
the potential of negatively influencing birth outcome.
reach the tertiary hospital. Also the study did not include
More targeted studies however are still needed to under-
still births and early prenatal deaths. Only two cases of
stand better the roles of these risk factors.
consanguineous relationship were identified. This is
understandable as in our setting consanguinity is not
practised and is viewed as a taboo. The two reported
cases were actually infants from northern Nigerian no-
Conclusion
madic Fulani settlers.
In conclusion, the prevalence of congenital anomalies in
Of the major cities where the patients reside in, Onitsha
Anambra state is low, but with concentrations in urban
contributed almost half (42%) of the burden of congeni-
areas with high population densities. Living close to
tal anomalies prevalence, followed by Nnewi at 21%
dump sites, telecom masts/base stations, high voltage
(Figure 2). These cities, especially Onitsha, are densely
electricity cables and heavy motorised highways are
populated urban cities in Anambra state with high ve-
potential risk factors that will need further specific stud-
hicular traffic, industrial pollutions and their share of
ies for characterisation.
urban slums. The high prevalence may be related to the
dense population, it is also possible that certain environ-
mental factors as stated earlier may be responsible for
Limitations
the increase. Most common anomalies from these areas
were urogenital (no=13, 12.0%) and gastrointestinal (no
Even though the data was collected from the only hospi-
=9, 8.3%). Further studies will be needed to fully under-
tal serving an entire state; being a hospital based study,
stand the specific role of environment on the high rate of
the results may not have been an exact reflection of the
anomalies on children born in these areas.
pattern in the general population. A community based
study will better assess the true pattern.
Worldwide more than half of the aetiology of congenital
anomalies is unknown. Environmental factors either
Conflict of interest: None
alone or in conjunction with genes account for about
Funding: None
References
1. World Health Organization.
3. Public Health Agency of Can-
5. EUROCAT working group.
Congenital anomalies, fact
ada. Congenital Anomalies in
Eurocat Report 7,Scientific
sheet No 370. Available at
Canada 2013: A Perinatal
Institute of Public Health-
who.int/mediacentre/factsheet/
Health Surveillance Report.
Louis Pasteur, Brussels, 1997
fs370/en. Updated 2015, ac-
Ottawa, 2013
6.
Eluwa MA, Aneosong SA,
cessed 30 March 2016
4.
Springett A, Budd J, Draper
Akpanta AO, Ekong MB,
2.
Imaizumi Y, Yamamura H,
ES, Kurinczuk JJ, Medina J,
Asuquo OR, Ekanem TB.
Nishikawa M, Matsuoka M,
Rankin J, Rounding C, Tucker
Congenital Malformations
Moriyama I. The prevalence at
D, Wellesley D, Wreyford B,
Recorded in four Hospitals in
birth of congenital malforma-
Morris JK. Congenital Anom-
Central Part of Cross River
tion at a maternity hospital in
aly Statistics 2012: England
State. Int J Pharm Sci Invent
Osaka City, 1948-1990. Jinrui
and Wales. London: British
2013;2(13):27-30
Idengaku Zasshi. 1991;36
Isles Network of Congenital
(3):275-87
Anomalies Registers. 2014
80
7. Okonkwo IR, Omoruyi HO,
12. Ngoc NTN, Merialdi M, Abdel-
17. Ekwere EO, Mcneil R, Agim
Abhulimhen-Iyoha, Omoigber-
Aleem H, Carolli G, Purwar M,
B, Jeminiwa B, Oni O, Pam
ale AI. Pattern of congenital
Zavaleta N, Campodonico L,
S. A retrospective study of
anomalies as seen in university
Ali MM , Hofmeyr G J et al.
congenital anomalies pre-
of Benin Teaching Hospital,
Causes of stillbirths and early
sented at a tertiary health fa-
Benin City, Nigeria. Sahel Med
neonatal deaths: data from
cilities in Jos, Nigeria. JPCS
J 2011;14(4):186-194
7993 pregnancies in six devel-
2011;3(3):24-28
8. Bakare TIB, Sowande OA,
oping countries. Bulletin of the
18. Cambra K, Ibanez B, Urzelai
Adejuyigbe OO, Chinda Y,
WHO 2006 ;84(9):99-705
D, Portillo I, Montoya I,
Usang UE. Epidemiology of
13. National population comission,
Esnaola S, Cirarda FB. Trends
external birth defects in neo-
Nigeria. Available at
in the prevalence of congenital
nates in south western Nigeria.
www.population.gov.ng/
anomalies and age at mother-
Afr J Paediatr Surg 2009;6
index.php/anambra-state. Ac-
hood in a southern European
(1):28-30
cessed 30 March, 2016
region: a population based
9. EkanemTB, Okon DE, Akpan-
14. Anambra. Available at: https://
study. BMJ Open
tah AO, Mesembe OE, Eluwa
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/
2014;4:e004244 doi: 10.1136/
MA, Ekong MB Prevalence of
Anambra. viewed May 14,2016
bmjopen-2013-004244
congenital malformations in
15. Obu HA, Chinawa JM, Uleanya
19. Ahlbom A, Green A, Kheifets
Cross River and Akwa Ibom
ND, Adimora GN, Obi IE.
L, Savitz D, Swerdlow A.
states of Nigeria from 1980 –
Congenital malformations
Epidemiology of health ef-
2003. Congenit Anom 2008;48
among newborns admitted in
fects of Radiofrequency Expo-
(4):167-70
the neonatal unit of a tertiary
sure. Environ Health Per-
10. Ambe JP, Madziga AG, Ak-
hospital in Enugu, Southeast
spect. 2004 ;112(17):1741-
pede GO, Mava Y. Pattern and
Nigeria- a retrospective study.
1754
Outcome of congenital malfor-
BMC Res Notes 2012; 5:177
20. Boehmer TK, Foster SL,
mations in babies in a Nigerian
DOI:10.1186/1756-0500-5-177
Henry JR, Woghiren-
Teaching Hospital. West Afr J
16. Gagnon A, Wilson RD, Allen
Akinnifesi EL, Yip FY. Resi-
Med. 2010;29(1):24-29
VM, Audibert F, Blight C,
dential Proximity to Major
11. Lemmens M, van Vugt JMG,
Brock JA, Desilets VA, John-
Highways- United States,
Willemsen M, van der Voorn
son JA, Langlois S, Murphy-
2010.Centers for Disease Con-
P, van Bokhoven H, ten
Kaulbeck L, Wyatt P; Society
trol and Prevention 2013; 62
Donkelaar HJ. Causes of con-
of Obstetricians of Canada.
(03): 46-50. Accessed at
genital malformations In: ten
Evaluation of prenatally diag-
cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/
Donkelaar HJ, Lammens
nosed structural congenital
mmwrhtml/su6203a8.htm
M,Hori A eds. Clinical Neuro-
anomalies. J Obstet Gynaecol
embryology. 2 ed. Berlin
nd
Can.2009;3(9)875-81,882-9
Heidelberg: Springer;
2014:105-164